Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has an overall score of 88, which is a little bit better than Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 global score. Despite being the best we compare here, Galaxy M31s's design is a little bit heavier and thicker than Motorola razr (2020). Both phones we are comparing have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Galaxy M31s has a little bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a little higher pixel density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy M31s counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy M31s captures clearer photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 114 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.