Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than Motorola razr (2020), getting a global score of 87.1 against 87. Although it's the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 design is notably older, thicker and a little heavier than the Motorola razr (2020). Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit better processor than Motorola razr (2020), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit bigger screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a greater screen density. The Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy Note9 features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a way better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note9 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.