Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZ3's 79.6 score. Motorola razr (2020) is a newer device, and it's also just a bit lighter and way thinner than Sony Xperia XZ3. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version while Sony Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xperia XZ3 features just a bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xperia XZ3 features a better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography, a camera in the back with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution and a larger sensor.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Xperia XZ3 has improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 19% more battery size.
Motorola razr (2020) costs a lot more than Sony Xperia XZ3, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.