Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 87 against 77.8. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Even though Motorola razr (2020) is incredibly older and a lot thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still somewhat lighter.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a larger display, a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution and a little better display pixels density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a lot higher video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because it has more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.