Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than the vivo X60 Pro, with a global score of 87 against 78.8. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even being the best cellphone in this review, it must be told that it's also a just a bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone. Vivo X60 Pro has a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2376, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit bigger screen.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same sensor size, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate.
The vivo X60 Pro's memory for games and applications is very similar to Motorola razr (2020)'s one, they have equal internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro features a really longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.