Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than Xiaomi Mi 5s, having an 87 score against 76.4. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is notably heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5s, it's a little bit thinner and notably newer.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with a better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 1920px resolution and a just a little higher screen pixels density.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a larger camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos and a larger camera aperture.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi 5s. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), else you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Mi 5s, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.