Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, getting an 83.7 score against 73.1. Both devices we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13 version. LG V50 ThinQ has a really superior processing power than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster).
LG V50 ThinQ has a better looking display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG V50 ThinQ captures greater videos and photos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Both of them have the same resolution back facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better battery duration than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3640mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.