Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a general score of 75.8, which is a bit better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's overall score of 73.1. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy A7 (2017) counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster). Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A7 (2017) features a very superior camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a lot higher 16 MP resolution camera. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Galaxy A7 (2017) count with similar batteries, although the Galaxy A7 (2017) has a 1 percent smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.