Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-06-01 |
| -- | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C5 has a score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's general score of 73.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy C5 has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy C5 has a slightly better screen than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, a quite inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen and a much smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy C5 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy C5, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Galaxy C5, because it has 3640mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh. The Galaxy C5 captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.