Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2013-09-25 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2640 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 426 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3640mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has an overall score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's score of 73.1. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version while Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has Android 13. The Galaxy Note3 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
The Galaxy Note3 features a little bit better looking display than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, a bit smaller display and a quite lower number of pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a very superior camera than Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, because it has a more MP camera in the back.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3640mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.