Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 80.3 score against 77.9. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a way newer and incredibly thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it is extremely heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the older 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit faster processor than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory and lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a way better display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better display density.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes way better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a back camera with lot more MP, a bigger aperture and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15% more battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.