Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-12 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Meteor grey | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting a general score of 80.3 against 78.8. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has older 10 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11. Even being the best phone we are comparing, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a thicker and a lot heavier phone than the vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes clearer photographs and videos than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a much higher resolution camera and a larger sensor taking better quality photos and videos.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with just a bit longer battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.