Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 554 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is much better than Nokia 8, getting a score of 81.2 against 73.8. Motorola Edge 50's body has the same thickness than the Nokia 8, but it is somewhat heavier. The Nokia 8 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 50 features a screen that's just as good as the screen in Nokia 8, because although the Motorola Edge 50 has a quite lower display density and a little worse resolution of 1220 x 2712px, it also counts with a bigger display and much more brightness. The Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better camera than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much better resolution back camera, a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Nokia 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.