Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-28 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 554 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has an overall score of 79.7, which is slightly better than Nokia 8's 73.8 global score. The Moto G Stylus body is newer than Nokia 8's, although it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Nokia 8 has a bit superior CPU than Moto G Stylus. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores.
The Nokia 8 has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Moto G Stylus has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 8, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Moto G Stylus features superior battery performance than Nokia 8, because it has a 29% more battery size. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Moto G Stylus is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.