Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-08-28 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.96 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blue, Brown and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 554 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3090mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than the Nokia 8's global score of 73.8. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a extremely newer phone than the Nokia 8, but it's thicker and extremely heavier. The Nokia 8 counts with a lot better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixel count per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Nokia 8 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A32 has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 shoots much better pictures and videos than Nokia 8, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light environments and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much longer battery performance than Nokia 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.