Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-07-29 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than Nokia XR20's 80.8 general score. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Nokia XR20 has Android 11. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is incredibly thinner and notably lighter than the Nokia XR20, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
Nokia XR20 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. The Nokia XR20 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit greater pixels density, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger display.
The Nokia XR20 captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a bigger aperture for better photos in low light situations and better video frame rates.
Nokia XR20 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Nokia XR20 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 16% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.