Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a somewhat thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3, even when they were only released 3 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie OS.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 and Galaxy A90 5G both feature incredibly similar displays, and although the Galaxy A90 5G has a little greater pixel number in each screen inch and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a same size screen.
Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor and a back facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments and a way higher video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.