Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than nubia Z20, getting a 91.8 score against 71.9. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G and nubia Z20 were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy A71 5G is a bit lighter and a little bit thinner. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Z20 has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Nubia Z20 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Z20 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a superior storage for games and applications than nubia Z20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a little better battery performance than nubia Z20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than nubia Z20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and higher 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.