Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's score of 74.4. Although iPhone 8 is a lot older than OPPO Find X2 Lite, it's design is a little thinner and lighter. The iPhone 8 features a bit faster CPU than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a lower number of cores and 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a slightly better display than iPhone 8, because although it has less bright display, it also counts with a much bigger display, a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater pixel density. OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture.
The iPhone 8 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 121% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.