Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a 91.8 score against 74.4. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, giving you some additional features. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the Galaxy A71 5G is an a little bit heavier and just a little thicker phone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little bit better display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality photos and a way more megapixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 12% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.