Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a global score of 81 against 74.4. Galaxy C9 Pro is an extremely older and just a bit heavier phone than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but Samsung managed to build it thinner anyway. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, so it gives a lot of extra features.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Lite has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen and a little bigger display.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a greater camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a camera with way more megapixels, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and video and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Galaxy C9 Pro features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and OPPO Find X2 Lite feature extremely similar batteries duration, although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.