Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a general score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 global score. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S6 edge+ construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it was released many years before.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ has a slightly better looking display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater screen pixels density.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Lite features greater battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.