Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having an 85.5 score against 74.4. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction has the same weight than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it is thicker. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a bit larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit more brightness. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture for better low light images and a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a battery duration that is just as good as the OPPO Find X2 Lite one, although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a 1% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.