Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than LG V30, getting a general score of 83.1 against 79.1. Even though the OPPO Find X2 Pro is noticeably newer than LG V30, it is thicker and noticeably heavier. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than LG V30, because although it has a bit worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a little larger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with better video frame rate, a much more mega pixels camera and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG V30, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro has greater battery life than LG V30, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.