Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Ocean | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 overall score. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 operating system. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X2 Pro, although it was released just a little over a year before.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit more storage to install applications and games than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more MP.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.