Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting a overall score of 83.3 against 83.1. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Galaxy M30s has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. Galaxy M30s's design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it's just a little bit lighter.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a quite larger screen and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a bit better performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same video definition and a 48 MP back-facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos, higher video frame rates and a way bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M30s counts with a way better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.