Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Ocean | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2's general score of 79.7. IPhone 8's body is noticeably lighter and a bit thinner than the OPPO Find X2, although it was released many years before. OPPO Find X2 counts with a more vivid display than iPhone 8, because it has way more pixels per inch of screen, a way larger display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and more display brightness.
The iPhone 8 features just a bit better performance than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 10 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone 8 counts with as much memory for games and applications as the OPPO Find X2, they have equal internal memory.
The OPPO Find X2 captures much better videos and photos than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 also has a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a lot more MP back facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments.
The OPPO Find X2 features a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.