Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than OPPO Find X2, getting a score of 91.8 against 79.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and the OPPO Find X2 were released with only 1 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G construction is a little bit thicker but a little bit lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10.
The OPPO Find X2 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a better pixel quantity per inch of screen. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.