Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting a overall score of 83.7 against 76. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is older and a bit thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a bit better performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a way better resolution camera.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V50 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.