Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Green | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is slightly better than OPPO Reno, with a global score of 78.5 against 72.8. Although Motorola One Action and the OPPO Reno were only released 2 months apart, Motorola One Action's design is just a little bit lighter but also just a little thicker. The OPPO Reno features a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Action features a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution. The OPPO Reno counts with a greater camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno also has a much higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations.
Motorola One Action counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. OPPO Reno has just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.