Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Green | Blue and Brown |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is better than the OPPO Reno, with an 80.7 score against 72.8. The Motorola One Vision is a a bit thinner and a bit lighter phone than the OPPO Reno, even though they were only released with a couple of months difference. OPPO Reno counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision has a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better display density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520. Motorola One Vision counts with a camera that is very similar to the camera in OPPO Reno, both of them have the same video frame rates, the same resolution back camera, the same back-facing camera sensor size, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Motorola One Vision features just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Reno has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 3765mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.