Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 is slightly better than the OPPO Reno, having a general score of 79.6 against 72.8. The Samsung Galaxy A30 construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno, although both of them were only released with a few months difference. OPPO Reno features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A30. Both of them have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the same number of pixels in each inch in the display and a display with the same size.
OPPO Reno features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno also has a camera in the back with way more MP, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way better video quality.
The OPPO Reno counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A30 features a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.