Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a general score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 score. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) is an a lot older and a little bit heavier cellphone than the OPPO Reno, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway. OPPO Reno features just a bit better display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little bit larger display, a little greater pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
OPPO Reno has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno features a little longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 3765mAh battery capacity. The OPPO Reno takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger aperture to take better low light photography and a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.