Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 is slightly better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a global score of 79.1 against 72. Xperia XZ2 is an older, heavier and incredibly thicker phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Xperia XZ2 features a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Xperia XZ2, because although it has a quite worse pixels number per inch in the display, it also counts with a little larger display, a lot brighter screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Sony Xperia XZ2 has more storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
OPPO Reno3 Pro captures better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels camera, a much bigger sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3180mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.