Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 global score. The LG Velvet is a just a little bit thinner and a little lighter phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much sharper display than LG Velvet. Both have an equal 1080 x 2460 resolution, a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a display with the same size.
The LG Velvet counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. LG Velvet takes way better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution.
LG Velvet counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than OSCAL Tiger 12, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. OSCAL Tiger 12 has improved battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.