Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is a lot better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a score of 91.2 against 71.5. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but LG Wing has an older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. LG Wing is a a lot thicker and incredibly heavier phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features an incredibly better looking screen than LG Wing. Both of them have a screen of the same size, a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and the same exact 1080 x 2460 resolution. The LG Wing counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Wing features a little bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. LG Wing shoots way better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. They have a 64 MP resolution back facing camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 features greater battery performance than LG Wing, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.