Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is a little bit better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a general score of 77.6 against 71.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, giving some extra features. The Moto Z3 body is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little larger display. The Moto Z3 features a bit more powerful CPU than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Moto Z3, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Moto Z3 shoots much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.