Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with a general score of 79.9 against 71.5. The Galaxy A25 5G construction has the same thickness than OSCAL Tiger 12, but it's a little lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, so it offers some extra features and performance enhancements.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a really brighter screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little larger display. OSCAL Tiger 12 and Galaxy A25 5G both count with extremely similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OSCAL Tiger 12 and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G both count with incredibly similar batteries performance. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with way less megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.