Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having a overall score of 79.4 against 71.5. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has newer 14 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, providing some extra features and enhanced performance. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G construction is a bit thinner but just a little heavier than OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a bit higher screen pixels density, way more brightness, a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a very superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with way less MP resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 and the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G have really similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.