Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a 90.7 score against 71.5. Galaxy A52's construction has the same thickness than the OSCAL Tiger 12, but it is just a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy A52's processing unit is just as good as OSCAL Tiger 12's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. Galaxy A52 captures greater photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have a 64 megapixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the OSCAL Tiger 12 one, both of them have a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.