Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, blue and white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | PLS |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M12 is better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with an 80 score against 71.5. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy M12 is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M12 has the previous 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a larger amount of RAM. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy M12, because it has a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy M12 shoots much better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera with much less mega pixels resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy M12 counts with improved battery duration than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.