| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 269.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 20 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Galaxy Note 4 has an overall score of 81.6, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's overall score of 71.5. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 4 has 5.0 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Galaxy Note 4 is a somewhat lighter phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12, but both of them are equally thin.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a better looking display than Galaxy Note 4, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has a little bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 takes better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.