Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is way better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Galaxy S20 FE body has the same thickness than the OSCAL Tiger 12, but it is just a bit lighter.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit superior processor than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 features slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy S20 FE shoots a lot better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.