Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having a 93.4 score against 71.5. Both of these phones work with the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so both should offer very similar operating system features. Galaxy S22 is a somewhat lighter and a bit thinner phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. The Galaxy S22 features a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S22, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit larger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a way brighter screen. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.