Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.99 ounces | -- |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12's global score of 71.5. The Galaxy S25 body is a lot thinner and extremely lighter than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has newer 14 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it gives some nice extra features and performance improvements.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S25, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with way more brightness, a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
Galaxy S25 counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera with much less mega pixels. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has longer battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.