Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.99 ounces | -- |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is way better than OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 score. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way lighter and thinner phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13, counting with lots of additional features.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has a quite worse display pixel density and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px, and they both have a same size screen, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also counts with way more brightness. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a camera with lot more megapixels. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and OSCAL Tiger 12 count with very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.