Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | -- |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black Shadow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 8.69 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, having a 91.1 score against 71.5. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a heavier but way thinner phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, so it gives some extra features.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a way brighter screen and a bit greater screen density. OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition takes a lot better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.