Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a overall score of 82.2 against 71.5. Xperia XZ2 Premium is a extremely thicker and heavier phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. The OSCAL Tiger 12 features a bit more vivid display than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2460px resolution and a much lower display density, it also counts with way more brightness and a larger screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a bit better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a really longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 41 percent larger battery capacity. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium captures way better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way less mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.