Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia Z4v is much better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with a global score of 78.8 against 71.5. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Sony Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version. The Sony Xperia Z4v is a a little thicker but lighter phone than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
Xperia Z4v has a little better hardware performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a little bit better display than Xperia Z4v, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2460 resolution and a way lower display pixels density, it also counts with a much larger screen.
Xperia Z4v shoots much clearer videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a way lower 20.7 megapixels resolution back facing camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z4v, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.