Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, getting a global score of 82.9 against 71.5. Both devices we are comparing here use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has 9.0 Pie version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13 version, counting with some extra features. Even being the best device we are comparing, Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a just a bit heavier and a bit thicker device than OSCAL Tiger 12.
OSCAL Tiger 12 features a lot better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a really brighter display, a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little bigger screen. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a much less megapixels resolution back facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.